Saturday, March 31, 2007

Stuff I saw today

Today was an exquisitely beautiful day... as I drove through southern Oklahoma on the way home from Ardmore, the smell of growing grass and blooming things was almost unbearably sweet. I stopped along the highway several times to capture some of what I saw. Here's a little bit of it:


The dogwoods were happy little trees today... I dodged a number of fire-ant mounds to get to this beauty this afternoon.

The full moon:



And the full moon as seen over Lake Texoma:

The sun was setting behind me as I snapped this one.

Rick is working his first night shift at Wal-Mart tonight, coming home in the morning and preaching a sermon, then sleeping through the afternoon. If the weather's as nice tomorrow as it was today, I saw several lovely spots where I'd like to photograph the kids. That should also give Rick some quiet hours to sleep before having to go back in to work again tomorrow night.

I went to a job fair sponsored by the Sherman school district this morning and chatted with several administrative types. I've also put in an application in a few other places as well, not all of them education-related. We shall see...

Friday, March 30, 2007

Surprise!!

My third period freshmen pulled a surprise party on me today. Well, actually, three girls from my third period were the ringleaders. These girls aren't the ones a person might expect to plan such an event, and I was touched and shocked.




This little girl was the main impetus behind the surprise and organized all the food (and there was an amazing amount of food). She's my one student this year who's also a young mother, and her own mother has been in and out of jail all year. I can read between the lines and I know that the deprivation in her life is profound, yet she apparently saved up her money to buy me food and flowers.
Apparently one morning last week we were discussing our favorite foods, and she quietly took notes. They had strawberries dipped in chocolate, banana pudding, pizza rolls, even cheesecake. And then there was this lovely bunch of hot-pink roses! The confetti and streamers were because they arranged for the front office to call me out of the room, and when I returned they showered me with all of it.


The outpouring of love from my students has been incredibly surprising to me. They seem truly disappointed that I won't be back next year, and I'm grieved to leave them. There isn't one of them I wouldn't take home with me, even the stinkers. I genuinely love them, and it's been encouraging to receive that love back from them.

Summertime is coming!

Prada coffee leather wood bead kitten sandals for $340 at Bluefly!

Today's English lesson

From the American Heritage Book of English Usage:


"One" Really IS
a Singular Sensation!



In formal usage, the pronoun one is sometimes used as a generic pronoun meaning “anyone”:
One would hope that train service could be improved.
The informal counterpart of one is you:
You never know what to expect from her.
Trouble arises when you use one in a series of sentences. You must choose a relative pronoun to refer back to one. You can of course use one and one’s repeatedly, as in
One tries to be careful about where one invests one’s money.
But in a sequence of sentences this may start to become tedious. A traditional alternative has been to use he, him, and his:
One tries to be careful about his investments.
This has the drawback of raising the specter of gender bias. Because of these problems, the temptation may arise to switch to you, but this will undoubtedly be distracting to your readers. It’s better to use the same generic pronoun throughout.

When constructions headed by one appear as the subject of a sentence or relative clause, there may be a question as to whether the verb should be singular or plural. The sentence
One of every ten rotors was found defective.
is perfectly grammatical, but sometimes people use plural verbs in such situations, as in
One of every ten rotors have defects.
In an earlier survey, 92 percent of the Usage Panel preferred the singular verb in such sentences.

Constructions such as one of those people who pose a different problem. Many people argue that who should be followed by a plural verb in these sentences, as in
He is one of those people who just don’t take “no” for an answer.
Their thinking is that the relative pronoun who refers to the plural noun people, not to one. They would extend the rule to constructions with inanimate nouns, as in
The sports car turned out to be one of the most successful products that were ever manufactured in this country.

But the use of the singular verb in these constructions is common, even among the best writers. In an earlier survey, 42 percent of the Usage Panel accepted the use of the singular verb in such constructions. It’s really a matter of which word you feel is most appropriate as the antecedent of the relative pronoun—one or the plural noun in the of phrase that follows it. Note also that when the phrase containing one is introduced by the definite article, the verb in the relative clause must be singular:
He is the only one of the students who has (not have) already taken Latin.

Constructions using one or more or one or two always take a plural verb:
One or more cars were parked in front of the house each day this week.
One or two students from our department have won prizes.
Note that when followed by a fraction, one ordinarily gets a plural verb:
One and a half years have passed since I last saw her.
The fraction rule has an exception in that amounts are sometimes treated as singular entities:
One and a half cups is enough sugar.
Note also that the plural rule does not apply to these one-plus-a-fraction constructions that are introduced by the indefinite article. These are always singular:
A year and a half has passed since I last saw her.

Today's fortune cookie

Thursday, March 29, 2007

GAH!!

I guess people DO grow up, and often while we're not looking.





And on March 1, Char announced on her web site that she and her boyfriend Gavin Henson are expecting a baby.

[gasp]

Left-coast loony

From the San Francisco news site SFGate.com comes this little "outdoor item":

Bobcat vs. squirrel: "I was on my daily noon-time run on some trails in the American River canyon when, just after cresting a small hill, I spotted what I thought was a large cat sitting in the middle of the trail. As I was within about 10 yards of this cat, I realized it was a bobcat intently staring at something midway up an adjacent oak tree. It didn't seem to be bothered by my presence however, as I slowly approached it, it scampered up that oak tree after a squirrel. Realizing what it was after, I shouted to warn the squirrel. It quickly scurried further up the tree and then jumped to an adjacent oak to safety. This bobcat then turned around and gave me one of most disgusted looks imaginable before retreating off into the brush." -- Marc Meyer


If any of you happen to know this poop-for-brains Marc Meyer dude, bean him in the head with an acorn for me, k? What a nutjob. Sixty bazillion tree rats in this world, and he feels compelled to rescue one from a magnificent bobcat looking for lunch.

Did you know

Did you know that it is exceptionally difficult to capture a lightning strike with an ordinary auto-focus digital camera? I tried, tonight, and got nowhere. It was a terrific night for such an endeavor, better than I've ever had the luxury of experiencing, and STILL I got nothing.

Nothing!



I suspect I might find more success with more sophisticated equipment, but this Sony Cybershot DSC-P92 is all I've got at the moment, so I'll make do. I think that, considering the idiot-proof nature of my little handheld camera, I end up with pretty decent photos in spite of it. For example, I did manage to get this pic of the roiling cloud formations over Ardmore, Oklahoma this evening:


The severe weather had been quite worse the day before, but I think that even though we did get vast quantities of rain, the atmosphere was just too cool for very much severe stuff. When the clouds are bluish like this, it seems to indicate cooler temperatures. The greener the sky appears, the nastier the possibilities, particularly for hail and tornadoes. That's just in my own personal experience; I have no idea if that pans out in actuality.

As for trying to capture a lightning strike, the closest I came was this photo:

It's the semi-daylight effect caused by a cloud-to-cloud bolt directly overhead. I know -- boring. But it's the best I could do tonight. There were some fabulous electrical displays all over the horizon on all sides of me, and durnit if I couldn't catch a single one.

I love photography!

Today's English lesson

From the American Heritage Book of English Usage:

Nothingness


According to the traditional rule, nothing is invariably treated as a singular, even when followed by an exception phrase containing a plural noun:
Nothing except your fears stands (not stand) in your way.
Nothing but roses meets (not meet) the eye.

Today's fortune cookie

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Today's English lesson

From the American Heritage Book of English Usage:



NOT!




You should be careful where you put not and other negatives in a sentence in order to avoid ambiguity. The sentence
All classes are not open to enrollment
could be taken to mean either
“All classes are closed to enrollment”
or
“Not all classes are open to enrollment.”
Similarly, the sentence
Kim didn’t sleep until noon
could mean either
“Kim went to sleep at noon”
or
“Kim got up before noon.”

Today's fortune cookie

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

I know it's only Tuesday, but...

I know it's not Friday night yet, but there were just a couple of photos I thought I should share with y'all:


Donatella Versace's daughter Allegra (did they name the allergy medicine after her, or was it the other way around?) came to her mom's show in a dress that does nothing to minimize her anorexia problem (which she is currently being treated for, it is said). Somehow the "shredded rags" oeuvre isn't as flattering as perhaps she was hoping. I hope she's able to beat the disorder, but somehow having Donatella Versace as a mom makes me want to lose my lettuce leaf lunch, too:



I tell you, this woman just frightens me. Perhaps she's a very nice person, but she's just so darn scary-looking, I don't know if I could stick around long enough to find out. Karl Lagerfeld has the same effect on me; I usually can tolerate or muster up an appreciation for their designs, but the designers themselves make me shudder in involuntary fear.

And finally, in the -- you guessed it -- Weird Hat of the Day category comes an odd creation which immediately brings to mind the fireworks you light on the driveway on July 4th every year and which, when lit, grow into twisty black charcoal foam snakes. You KNOW as soon as you look at this that that's exactly what Italian designer Cavagna was thinking of when this came about:It's either the Magic Black Snakes or it is some form of very large intestinal parasite that Cavagna contracted from eating a salad in a Bangkok slum.

GOP Straw Poll



Today's English lesson

From the American Heritage Book of English Usage:


Neither Snow
Nor
Rain
Nor Heat
Nor
Gloom Of Night
Stays These
Couriers From The
Swift Completion Of
Their Appointed Rounds



The rules for using nor are neither simple nor easy to spell out. When using neither in a balanced construction that negates two parts of a sentence, you must use nor, not or, in the second part. Thus you must say
He is neither able nor (not or) willing to go.
Similarly, you must use nor (not or) when negating the second of two negative independent clauses:
He cannot find anyone now, nor does he expect to find anyone in the future.
Jane will never compromise with Bill, nor will Bill compromise with Jane.
Note that in these constructions nor causes an inversion of the auxiliary verb and the subject (does he will Bill …). However, when a verb is negated by not or never, and is followed by a negative verb phrase (but not an entire clause), you can use either or or nor:
He will not permit the change or (or nor) even consider it.
In noun phrases of the type no this or that, or is actually more common than nor:
He has no experience or interest (less frequently nor interest) in chemistry.
Or is also more common than nor when such a noun phrase, adjective phrase, or adverb phrase is introduced by not:
He is not a philosopher or a statesman.
They were not rich or happy.

Today's fortune cookie

Monday, March 26, 2007

Hooray!!

It's raining buckets in North Ruralville, I'm delighted to report. It's been raining all evening. We have needed it so badly for so long that I'm not sure the dirt around here knows what to do with all of it.

Thought for the day

It's flower time!

First up, we have Lupinus texensis, or the Texas Bluebonnet (the state flower of Texas). They are simply spectacular, particularly when they turn an entire hillside a brilliant royal blue. These are natives but were actually grown in my mom's flowerbeds, but the wild ones are just beginning to hit their full stride here in north Texas.



Often seen blooming in the same patches as bluebonnets are the Indian paintbrush, which I now know ISN'T the state flower of Oklahoma, but in my opinion they should be:



I'm ashamed to admit it, because I like to know things, but the next photo is a flower I've seen but never known. It looks for all the world to be some sort of species lantana (the flower, not the foliage), but I can't seem to find it in any of my sources.



These delightful little white flowers are, I believe, wild onions.



They're not wild at all, but the wisteria is in full bloom right now as well, and it's difficult to resist photographing the heavy grapelike clusters of gorgeous purple flowers.

Today's English lesson

From the American Heritage Book of English Usage:

I'll Have None of That!


“… and then there were none.”
The closing words of this well-known nursery rhyme should dispel the notion that none can only take a singular verb. People opposing the plural use base their argument on the fact that none comes from the Old English word an, meaning “one.” But the citational evidence against restricting none is overwhelming. None has been used as both a singular and plural pronoun since the ninth century. The plural usage appears in the King James Bible as well as the works of John Dryden and Edmund Burke and is widespread in the works of respected writers today.

Of course, the singular usage is perfectly acceptable. Whether you should choose a singular or plural verb depends on the effect you want. You can use either a singular or a plural verb in a sentence such as
None of the conspirators has (or have) been brought to trial.
However, none can only be plural when used in sentences such as
None but his most loyal supporters believe (not believes) his story.

Today's fortune cookie

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Three Little Words

It's a meme! I took up the baton from Kevin over at Yippee-Ki-Yay! and ran with it. You have to answer each question with only three words.

1. Where is your cell phone? In my purse.
2. Boyfriend/girlfriend? You're kidding, right?
3. Hair? Chestnut-colored mop.
4. Your mother? Short and sweet.
5. Your father? Best Dad EVAR.
6. Your favorite item(s)? Laptop with wi-fi.
7. Your dream last night? Classroom Shakespeare disaster.
8. Your favorite drink? Sonic strawberry limeade.
9. Your dream guy/girl? Captain Jack Sparrow.
10. The room you are in? Pink-flowered bedroom.
11. Your fear? Life without passion.
12. What do you want to be in 10 years? Experiencing God's best.
13. Who did you hang out with last night? My daughter Martha.
14. What are you not? A neat freak.
15. Are you in love? Hmmm... it depends.
16. One of your wish list items? New DSLR camera.
17. What time is it? Nine thirty-two.
18. The last thing you did? Cleaned my desk.
19. What are you wearing? Ratty old nightgown.
20. You last ate: Sonic popcorn chicken.
21. Your life? Spinning my wheels.
22. Your mood? Pretty darn decent.
23. Your friends? I have three.
24. What are you thinking about right now? You'll never know.
25. Your car? White Toyota minivan.
26. What are you doing at this moment? Drinking some cabernet.
27. Your summer? Not long enough.
28. Your relationship status? Immense quantum singularity.
29. What is on your TV screen? Probably Fairly Oddparents.
30. When is the last time you laughed? Earlier this evening.
31. Last time you cried? Lost my job.
32. School? Every friggin' day.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

And on a related note...

When I did a GIS for images of "Thing 1," I stumbled upon this lovely (and large) artwork called "The Thing That Thing 1 Did to Thing 2" by Steve Draeger. Cool, eh? It's 4.5' x 4.5', too... big enough for some serious wow factor.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Friday Night Fashionblogging

Found some, er, interesting items in the fashion photo roundup this evening. First up, we have an entry from Ukraine Fashion Week's FashionAID show, featuring the works of 30 designers which will be auctioned off to raise money for AIDS research:


It's a Drag Queen in a Bellybutton Dress. With a blue afro-wig. Walking in lovely red heels on what appears to be wire shelving. I can't make up anything funnier than the truth, here. (UPDATE: I can't imagine why I didn't put it together on this one... LJ reminded me that he's dressed as one of Dr. Seuss' "Things" ... but I'm guessing that since it's an AIDS benefit, the designer is doing a social-consciousness bit and saying that one of the Things lost his partner...)

Next up -- Mexico Fashion Week:

We have what now seems to be the trend -- facial fashion. This woman is wearing a creation by designer Felipe. The outfit might've been pretty. I don't know, because she appears to be wearing the remnants of Felipe's dryer-lint screen on her FACE.


Designer group Rexona Crystal looks like they had a whole bunch of extra black tulle which they wadded up wildly and forced their model to roll in. She couldn't get the black bra past her face, so it stuck there. And since she could no longer see, she was unable to find her shoes.



May God have mercy on all our souls... Grypho is heralding the return of the Aztec Warrior Maidens. They're coming for UR kids.

Finally, a few items from India Fashion Week:

If you don't like the Shroff-Gupta collection, you get nailed with a Super-Soaker.


Pandey, however, had some pretty (if overly khaki-colored) designs on display. The beading details were quite lovely.



Note the really pretty hemline. Oh, wait. I can't stop looking at the NASTY GRIMY MOTH-EATEN RAGDOLL. That is just gross!!

Why do they feel obligated to detract from an actually decent collection with crap like this?

All in all, I didn't really see anything that jazzed me up, per se. Not this week, anyway. Maybe next week? Stay tuned...

Today's English lesson

From the American Heritage Book of English Usage:

In the Neither-world


neither or none. According to the traditional rule, neither is used only to mean “not one or the other of two.” To refer to “none of several,” none is preferred:
None (not neither) of the three opposition candidates would make a better president than the incumbent.

singular or plural. The traditional rule also holds that neither is grammatically singular:
Neither candidate is having an easy time with the press.
However, it is often used with a plural verb, especially when followed by of and a plural:
Neither of the candidates are really expressing their own views.
(note: I do not agree that this is an acceptable usage... I believe that the sentence should read "Neither of the candidates is expressing his own views." Unfortunately, English doesn't seem to have a good singular asexual pronoun suitable for human appellation, hence the dubious acceptability of the pluralization of "neither," particularly in cases where the two candidates are of differing genders.)


neither … (n)or. As a conjunction neither is properly followed by nor, not or, in formal style:
Neither prayers nor curses (not or curses) did any good.

Today's fortune cookie

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Diaper Dads

These guys just can't handle it. Although I will confess, when we were super-poor back when Martha was a baby, I used cloth diapers on her and I always wore rubber gloves to deal with them because they were just so yucky (hehe).

Anyway, my Aunty Ada e-mailed this to me and it gave me a chuckle, so I thought I'd share.



Larry Bud Melman, R. I. P.


Calvin DeForest dead at 85

I loved Calvin DeForest's spots on Letterman. He was on the very first episode in 1982, and continued to make appearances there until 2002. His starkly odd persona was perfect for the Letterman schtick.

Today's English lesson

From the American Heritage Book of English Usage:

You Must Needs Use
Auxiliary Verbs, But You
Ought Not Use Them Improperly

The auxiliary verb must is used to express necessity, obligation, and probability:
Plants must have water in order to live.
Swimmers must take a shower before entering the pool.
You must be joking.
Unlike other auxiliaries like can and may, must has no past form like could or might:
They insisted we must wait until tomorrow.
In this regard must resembles need and ought to.

Depending on the sense, the verb need behaves sometimes like an auxiliary verb (such as can or may) and sometimes like a main verb (such as want or try). When used as a main verb, need agrees with its subject, takes to before the verb following it, and combines with do in questions, negations, and certain other constructions:
He needs to go.
Does he need to go so soon?
He doesn’t need to go.
When used as an auxiliary verb, need does not agree with its subject, does not take to before the verb following it, and does not combine with do:
He needn’t go.
Need he go so soon?
Unlike can and may, however, auxiliary need has no other form like could and might for the past tense:
He said we need not worry about that.
ought as auxiliary verb. Ought is an auxiliary verb that usually takes to with its accompanying verb:
We ought to go.
Sometimes the accompanying verb is dropped if the meaning is clear:
Should we begin soon? Yes, we ought to.
In questions and negative sentences, especially those with contractions, to is also sometimes omitted:
We ought not be afraid of the risks involved.
Oughtn’t we be going soon?
This omission of to, however, is not common in written English. Like must and auxiliary need, ought to does not change to show past tense:
He said we ought to get moving along.

ought in regional expressions. Usages such as
He hadn’t ought to come.
and
She shouldn’t ought to say that.
are common in many varieties of American English. They should be avoided in written English, however, in favor of the more standard variant ought not to.

Today's fortune cookie

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Ms. Cornelius gets Historical


The de-emphasis of history education

I'm seeing similar problems in my own experiences in public education -- the insane push away from real education toward test-taking. Reading and math are critically important, but they go hand in hand with the humanities, and an entire generation or two is graduating from our high schools without any clear understanding of history.

I think that the battle-to-the-death between revisionists and multiculturalists and nationalists has deadlocked, and the high-school textbook has suffered greatly because of it. Now we feel obligated to include a blurb about every little ethnic group and minority and woman and disabled person and whatnot, to the detriment of the understanding of the incredible feat performed by the founders of our country. Large sections of the literature text is devoted to crappy poetry and stories simply because they belong to some perceived oppressed people group, and there's little room left for truly classic, pivotally important works of literature.

I don't know where this will lead us all, but if I'm able to make the leap out of public education altogether this year, I don't think I'll be terribly disappointed. I'll miss my students, but the state of affairs in general is pretty dismal, in my estimation. The kids are getting shortchanged, and I don't like it. I'm hopeful that the Law of Diminishing Returns will eventually kick in and real education will return, but I've been hoping for that for a long time and haven't seen any improvement.

"No Child Left Behind" is crap. It has nothing whatsoever to do with children.

Believe me, I earned that t-shirt


I had earlier decided I probably wouldn't blog about this because it was just too embarrassing. Then I remembered that that never stopped me before.

On Monday when we returned to school from Spring Break, there were signs in the hallway announcing that the blood drive people were going to be at school on Wednesday taking donations in the gym. I was glad, since this would be the first time I've qualified to give blood since before I was pregnant with Isaac. I like being able to donate blood; it makes me feel like I'm doing good for someone and it doesn't take a sacrifice for me other than a few minutes and a momentary sting. Pain isn't a big thing for me; never really has been.

They gave me the usual battery of questions, checked my blood iron levels (I was a 14), measured my blood pressure (90/70 -- yay for blood pressure medication) and declared me fit to give blood. I leaned back in the nice blue chaise and they hooked me up. Within two minutes I began feeling odd, but I breathed evenly and slowly and sipped some chilled water.

"Your output is terrific," the attending nurse declared. Her voice sounded very distant, which I knew meant that I was on my way out of Conscious-ville.

"I think I'm going out," I said.

When I opened my eyes, there were several people around me, putting cold cloths on my head and telling me to open my eyes and wiggle my feet and sip some water. "Oh, no, I'm sorry!" I said.

"Don't worry," my nurse reassured me. "It happens to some people. Just drink some water and keep your feet moving." She was very kind and kept chatting with me. "You're putting out plenty," she said. "It should only be a couple more minutes."

I felt alert and okay again fairly quickly, and thought I'd make it through the session without any other problems. Suddenly, however, I felt it coming back on. "I think it's happening again." I couldn't keep my eyes open; all I wanted to do was go to sleep, which I knew wasn't a good thing to do. After a few more cool cloths, I said, "I think I'm going to throw up." They put a bag over my face and I puked HARD about four or five times... and realized to my horror that I had just lost the contents of my bladder as well.

I began feeling better after vomiting, but was quite concerned about the lovely warm feeling under my behind. "I think I peed myself," I whispered to my nurse. She confirmed it and said, "I think you'd better not bend over when you leave here." I agreed, and after a short recovery period in which I made sure there weren't a lot of people hanging around, I made my escape. Thank goodness school had already gotten out, and I was able to scuttle out to the van and put a plastic bag in the seat and drive the six blocks back home.

Yes, by gum, I did earn that t-shirt. Not sure I want any more, however.

Laurence Simon cracks me up

He umm... uncovered... a story about a golf course discovery. And he agrees with me about the wise use of real estate property.

Today's English lesson

From the American Heritage Book of English Usage:


There's More Than One
Way to Look at This



Here’s a riddle: How can you have more than one and still have only one? The answer: When you are skinning a cat. When a noun phrase contains more than one and a singular noun, the verb is normally singular:
There is more than one way to skin a cat.
More than one editor is working on that project.
More than one field has been planted with oats.
When more than one is followed by of and a plural noun, the verb is plural:
More than one of the paintings were stolen.
More than one of the cottages are for sale.
When more than one stands alone, it usually takes a singular verb, but it may take a plural verb if the notion of multiplicity predominates:
The operating rooms are all in good order.
More than one is (or are) equipped with the latest imaging technology.